NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Ostendorf (No 2) [2016] NSWCATOD 44 Hearing dates: 24 February 2016 and 5 April 2016 Date of orders: 14 April 2016 Decision date: 14 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: R Titterton, Senior Member A Bizzotto, Professional Member R O'Donnell, Professional Member Dr C Berglund, General Member Decision: 1 Pursuant to reg 9 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2013, the orders of the Tribunal of 7 December 2015 are set aside, and in lieu thereof the Tribunal orders that the conditions set out in Attachment A be recorded on the applicant's registration maintained by the Australian Health Practitioners Regulatory Authority.
2 Pursuant to s 45 of the Civil and Administrative Decisions Act 2013 extend the time for the Health Care Complaints Commission to make its application to set aside and vary the orders of 7 December 2015 to 5 April 2016.
3 The respondent to pay the Health Care Complaints Commission's costs of the proceedings, other than the costs of and incidental to the hearings of 24 February and 5 April 2016.
4 There be no order as to costs in respect of the hearings of 24 February and 5 April 2016. Catchwords: Civil and Administrative Tribunal – Occupation Division – Power to review decisions already published – whether function of Tribunal administrative in nature Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) No. 86a Administrative Decisions Review Act 1977 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act (2013) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation (2013) Cases Cited: Attorney-Attorney-General (NSW) v Kennedy Miller Television Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 729 Campbelltown City Council v Vegan [2006] NSWCA 284 Health Care Complaints Commission v Ostendorf [2015] NSWCATOD 137 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2002] HCA 11 Riverina Wines Pty Ltd v Registrar of the Workers Compensation Commission of NSW [2007] NSWCA 149 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Ms Katrina Ostendorf (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Talbert (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate