NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Thomson [2016] NSWCCA 56 Hearing dates: 24 March 2016 Date of orders: 18 April 2016 Decision date: 18 April 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Harrison J at [77] Davies J at [78] Decision: (1) The Crown appeal is allowed. (2) The sentences imposed by his Honour on 28 September 2015 are quashed. (3) In lieu thereof, the respondent is sentenced as follows: (i) In respect of the State offences, including the matter on the Form 1, the respondent is sentenced to an aggregate sentence of imprisonment with a non-parole period of 6 years commencing 19 January 2012 and expiring 18 January 2018 with a balance of term of 3 years expiring 18 January 2021. (ii) In respect of the Commonwealth offence, the respondent is sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 7½ years commencing 19 January 2015 and expiring 18 July 2022 with a balance of term of 6½ years expiring 18 January 2029. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against sentence – conspiracy to import substantive quantity of drugs including 3.96kgs pure cocaine and 2.25kgs pure MDMA and supply large commercial quantity 1.97kgs methylamphetamine – conspiracy to import and large commercial supply separate and discrete offences – sentence for large commercial supply fully concurrent with sentence for conspiracy to import – objective seriousness of each offence high – modest subjective case – need to ensure public confidence in the administration of criminal justice – error in sentences not being partially cumulative – need to re-sentence. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – s 16A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – s 32 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 5D Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) – ss 11.1(5) and 307.1(1) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) – ss 25(1), 25(2) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) – s 7(1) Cases Cited: CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales [2015] HCA 9 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Everett v The Queen [1994] HCA 49; 181 CLR 295 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Griffiths v The Queen [1977] HCA 44; 137 CLR 293 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 House v R [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Makarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Pannowitz v R [2016] NSWCCA 13 R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540; 118 A Crim R 66 R v Thomson (District Court (NSW), Williams SC DCJ, 28 September 2015, unrep) Regina v Cahyadi [2007] NSWCCA 1 Regina v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115 SZ v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 19; 168 A Crim R 249 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina – Appellant Crown Reese Daniel Thomson - Respondent Representation: Counsel: Mr Bourke SC – Appellant Crown Mr G Scragg - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate