NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Estate Pascale [2016] NSWSC 443 Hearing dates: 11 and 12 April 2016 Date of orders: 15 April 2016 Decision date: 15 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Lindsay J Decision: (1) Family provision orders made for the deceased's former de facto partner to receive a legacy of $100,000 (in lieu of $10,000 under his will) and for two adult children each to receive a legacy of $60,000. (2) Orders for costs payable out of the estate to be capped. (3) Consequential orders adjusting the rights of a residuary beneficiary. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Family Provision – Whether applicant left with insufficient provision – Claims by former partner and adult children – Competing claims of widow and minor child – Orders made capping costs payable out of estate Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 NSW Interpretation Act 1987 Succession Act 2006 NSW Cases Cited: Andrew v Andrew (2012) 81 NSWLR 656) Burke v Burke [2015] NSWCA 195 at [101]-[103] Churton v Christian (1988) 13 NSWLR 241 at 252 A-E In re Allen, Deceased [1922] NZLR 218 at 220) Luciano v Rosenblum (1985) 2 NSWLR 65 at 69G-70A Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR 9 at 20 Re Fulop deceased (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Texts Cited: - Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff (2015/00090868): Hong Gao Plaintiff (2015/00171373): Jean-Louis Pascale Plaintiff (2015/00233467): Patricia Pascale Defendant: John Anthony Picone Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff (Hong Gao): T Morahan Plaintiff (Jean-Louis Pascale): S Chapple Plaintiff (Patricia Pascale): J Brown Defendant: AL Hill
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate