Structural Projects Holdings Pty Ltd v Balakrishnan [2016] NSWSC 458
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Structural Projects Holdings Pty Ltd v Balakrishnan [2016] NSWSC 458
Hearing dates: 1 April 2016
Date of orders: 01 April 2016
Decision date: 01 April 2016
Jurisdiction: Common Law
Before: Wilson J
Decision: (1) The matter is adjourned until 7 April 2016 before the Duty Judge at 10 am for further mention.
(2) I extend Order 2 of Harrison J of 31 March 2016 until 4 pm on 7 April 2016.
(3) I note Mr Janoyan's undertaking to contact the defendant's agent via email and advise the agent of the orders made by the Court today and, in particular, the fact that the matter is listed for further mention on 7 April 2016.
Catchwords: PROCEDURE – civil – stay of execution of writ of possession
Category: Procedural and other rulings
Parties: Structural Projects Holdings Pty Ltd (Plaintiff)
Mohan Balakrishnan (Defendant)
Representation: Citilawyers (Plaintiff)
File Number(s): 2016/98183
Publication restriction: None
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT
1. On 31 March 2016, Harrison J made interim orders in his capacity as the Duty Judge which granted, amongst other things, a stay of execution by the defendant through, either itself, its servants or its agents, of a warrant for possession, or cognate process to recover possession, of property at 2 Summit Place, Strathfield.
2. His Honour's orders were that the plaintiff, Structural Projects Holdings Pty Ltd, through their agent representative Benjamin Webb, were to pay to the defendant's agent the sum of $19,550.
3. Filed in court this morning in accordance with his Honour's orders, is a receipt annexed to the affidavit of Benjamin Michael Webb sworn today, 1 April 2016. Mr Webb deposes that he has transferred by electronic means the sum of $19,550 to the defendant, and a receipt for that payment is annexed to the affidavit.
4. I am advised from the bar table, and indeed it is consistent with Mr Webb's affidavit, that Mr Janoyan, who now acts for Mr Webb, has made contact with the defendant's agent. The agent has confirmed receipt of the process which his Honour gave leave to the plaintiff to file and serve and is, it would appear, desirous of some short period to permit the agent to contact the defendant and obtain some instructions.
5. The outstanding sum having been paid in accordance with his Honour's orders, I make the following orders:
1. The matter is adjourned until 7 April 2016 before the Duty Judge at 10am for further mention.
2. I extend Order 2 of Harrison J of 31 March 2016 until 4 pm on 7 April 2016.
3. I note Mr Janoyan's undertaking to contact the defendant's agent via email and advise the agent of the orders made by the Court today and in particular, the fact that the matter is listed for further mention on 7 April 2016.
**********
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Decision last updated: 18 April 2016
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.