NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wiseman v R [2016] NSWCCA 61 Hearing dates: 20 April 2016 Date of orders: 22 April 2016 Decision date: 22 April 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Harrison J at [23] Schmidt J at [24] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – supplying a prohibited drug – applicant serving other sentences – whether sentencing judge appropriately took into account the fact of those other sentences when imposing sentence in this matter – no error – appealed dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – s 10A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 6(3) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) – s 25(1) Cases Cited: Luke Nathan Richard Barrett v R [2011] NSWCCA 213 R v Wiseman (District Court (NSW) Toner SC DCJ, 20 April 2015) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lucas John Wiseman – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Ms C Wasley – Applicant Mr H Baker – Respondent Crown
Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW – Applicant Solicitor for Public Prosecutions – Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2014/161931 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 20 April 2015 Before: Toner SC DCJ File Number(s): 2014/161931
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate