NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lam v Rolls Royce PLC (No 4) [2016] NSWSC 487 Hearing dates: 15 April 2016 Date of orders: 15 April 2016 Decision date: 15 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) The plaintiff pay the defendant's costs thrown away by reason of the adjournment of the proceedings on 10 December 2015.
(2) The balance of the defendant's notice of motion filed 24 March 2016 be adjourned to Friday, 29 April 2016 at 9.30am before Beech-Jones J.
(3) The plaintiff's notice of motion filed 30 March 2016 be adjourned to Friday, 29 April 2016 at 9.30am before Beech-Jones J.
(4) The parties to confer in relation to the appropriate orders for the further progress of the proceedings. Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – costs – defence seeks order in respect of discrete issues – whether costs should be reserved or costs order made – adjournment of hearing of determination of separate question because of departure from its foreign law notice. Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – Pt 10, s 56 Cases Cited: - Regie National des Uisines Renault SA v Zhang [2002] HCA 10; 210 CLR 491 - Lam v Rolls Royce PLC (No 3) (2015) NSWSC 83 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Sandy Lam (Plaintiff) Rolls Royce PLC Reg No 4706930 (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J.E. Rowe (Plaintiff) N.E. Chen (Defendant)
Solicitors: LHD Lawyers (Plaintiff) Holman Fenwick Willan (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/037342
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate