NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kidu v Fifer & Ors [2016] NSWSC 488 Hearing dates: 14 April 2016 Date of orders: 22 April 2016 Decision date: 22 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Injunction granted on terms that the plaintiff provide satisfactory security in the sum of $250,000. Catchwords: EQUITY – unconscionable conduct and promissory estoppel – first defendant makes documentary including film of the plaintiff – plaintiff alleges that the first defendant represented to her that the film footage taken would only be used for the plaintiff's film school course – documentary completed and proposed to be shown at an international documentary film festival – rights to the documentary assigned to the second and then the third defendants – whether there is a serious question to be tried that the documentary was filmed in circumstances in which the plaintiff was assured that its use would be limited; and whether the first defendant has unconscionably resiled from their assurance to the plaintiff.
INJUNCTION – interlocutory injunction – whether an interlocutory injunction should be granted - whether the plaintiff has established a serious question to be tried – whether the balance of convenience, questions of hardship and other relevant factors favour the grant of an interlocutory injunction in the circumstances - on what terms should any injunction be granted. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), s 5(1). Supreme Court Act 1970 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Company v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 Beecham Group Limited v Bristol Laboratories Pty Limited (1968) 118 CLR 618 Beese v Woodhouse [1970] 1 WLR 586 Doherty v Allman (1873) 3 App Cas 709 Edelsten v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1984) Aust Torts Reports 80 – 672 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of South Australia Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95, [2002] HCA 8 Francome v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [1984] 1 WLR 892 Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 McCarty v Council of the Municipality of North Sydney (1918) 18 SR (NSW) 210 Otis Elevator Company Ltd v Nolan [2007] NSWSC 593 Stocker v McElhinney (No. 2) [1961] NSWR 1043 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 Texts Cited: JD Heydon, MJ Leeming and PG Turner, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines & Remedies (5th ed 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Carol Anne Kidu First Defendant: Hollie Fifer Second Defendant: Media Stockdale Pty Ltd Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate