NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SAMM Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Shaye Properties Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 497 Hearing dates: On the papers; submissions received 6, 11, 15 and 18 April 2016. Decision date: 22 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Expedition List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Defendant entitled to interest on purchase price until completion; interest provision not a penalty; defendant entitled to costs but not on an indemnity basis. Catchwords: CONTRACT – whether interest payable by purchaser to vendor on purchase price of rectified contract - meaning of "in accordance with the provisions herein" of a rectified contract – whether provision for interest a penalty; COSTS - Calderbank offer – whether offer involved significant compromise – whether vendor unreasonable not to accept offer Cases Cited: Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2012] HCA 30; 247 CLR 205 Issa v Berisha [1981] 1 NSWLR 261 Legione v Hateley [1983] HCA 11; 152 CLR 406 SAMM Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Shaye Properties Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 362 Texts Cited: J D Heydon, M J Leeming and P G Turner, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity Doctrines and Remedies, (5th ed 2015, Lexis Nexis) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: SAMM Property Holdings Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Shaye Properties Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G George with J Bennett (Plaintiff) M P Cleary (Defendant)
Solicitors: Reimer Winter Williamson (Plaintiff) Newhouse & Arnold Solicitors (Defendant) File Number(s): SC 2015/322545
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate