NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of THO Services Limited [2016] NSWSC 509 Hearing dates: Thursday, 17 March 2016 Date of orders: 21 March 2016 Decision date: 21 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: 1. Pursuant to (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s. 447A, Part 5.3A of the Act operate in relation to THO Services Limited as if for the purposes of s 440D(1), a "proceeding in a court" included an arbitration proceeding to the intent that s 440D(1) applies to the arbitration proceedings between the company and the Commonwealth of Australia and the International Chamber of Commerce Court of Arbitration, case number 21321/CYK. 2. Costs of the application be costs in the administration of the company. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – where "proceeding in a Court" does not include private arbitration proceeding for purposes of (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 440D(1) – whether power to make order under s 447A that s 440D operates as if it does include arbitration – whether, if order can be made, whether it ought to be made as a matter of discretion – relevant considerations Legislation Cited: (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 440D, s 436A, s 439A, s 440D, s 440D(1), s 444E, s 447A, s 471B. (CTH) International Arbitration Act 1974 (VIC) Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 Cases Cited: Auburn Council v Austin Australia Pty Ltd (2004) NSWSC 141 Australasian Memory Pty Ltd v Brian (2000) 200 CLR 270 Larkden Pty Ltd v Lloyd Energy Systems Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1305 285 ALR 207 Mowbray College v Exhib Design & Construction Pty Ltd (1987) 5 ACLC 478 Re Ansett Australia Ltd [2001] FCA 1806 (2002) 115 FCR 376 Re Vassal Pty Limited [1983] 2 Qd R 769 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Paul Gerard Weston & Geoffrey Trent Hancock as Administrators of THO Services Limited (administrators appointed)(first plaintiff) THO Services Limited (administrators appointed)(second plaintiff) The Commonwealth of Australia (defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Finnane (plaintiffs) O McCoy (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate