NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mirzazadeh v R [2016] NSWCCA 65 Hearing dates: 18 April 2016 Date of orders: 29 April 2016 Decision date: 29 April 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Harrison J at [82] Schmidt J at [83] Decision: (1) The appeal against conviction is allowed. (2) The appellant's conviction for attempting to possess a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug is quashed. (3) There should be a re-trial on that count. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – attempt to possess an unlawfully imported substance – defence of duress primary issue in trial – evidence of duress given by accused and other witnesses – interaction of ss 10.2 and 13.3 of Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) – whether accused satisfied evidentiary onus – issue of duress taken from jury – error established – re-trial ordered. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 6(1) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) – s 10.2, s 11.1, s 13.3, s 307.5 Cases Cited: Giourtalis v R [2013] NSWCCA 216 Lindsay v R [2015] HCA 16; 319 ALR 207 Oblach v The Queen [2005] NSWCCA 440; 65 NSWLR 75 R v Chiron [1980] 1 NSWLR 218 R v Tan Phuong Le (No 3) [2010] NSWDC 37 Taiapa v The Queen [2009] HCA 53; 240 CLR 95 The Queen v Khazaal [2012] HCA 26; 246 CLR 610 Weiss v The Queen [2005] HCA 81; 224 CLR 300 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Arjang Mirzazadeh – Applicant Commonwealth Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr T Game SC – Applicant Mr P Neil SC – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate