NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Qaumi & Ors (No 25) [2016] NSWSC 514 Hearing dates: 26 April 2016 Date of orders: 26 April 2016 Decision date: 28 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: Application for discharge of the jury refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for discharge of jury by four of five accused – publication of newspaper article concerning alleged victim of shooting incident – where article followed a television program in which victim and his mother were interviewed – both interviewees witnesses in current trial – where article unrelated to current proceedings – where article failed to distinguish between chapters of Brothers for Life – presentation of alleged victim – uninspiring performance – self-aggrandising gangster figure – buffoon – conduct of jury demonstrates obedience to directions – repeated directions to decide case on the evidence – no real risk that jury will be influenced – appropriate directions – application refused. Cases Cited: R v Qaumi & Ors (No 21) [2016] NSWSC 402 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Farhad Qaumi Mumtaz Qaumi Jamil Qaumi Mohammed Zarshoy Mohammed Kalal Representation: Counsel: K McKay & P Hogan (Crown) J Stratton SC & M Curry (F Qaumi) P Young SC (M Quami) N Carroll(J Quami) R Driels (Zarshoy) G Clarke (Kalal)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate