NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: JB v R (No 2) [2016] NSWCCA 67 Hearing dates: 16 September 2015 Date of orders: 29 April 2016 Decision date: 29 April 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [129] McCallum J at [137] Decision: (1) The appeal against conviction is allowed. (2) The conviction for the murder of Edward Spowart is quashed. (3) That a verdict of acquittal be entered in favour of JB. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – murder which occurred on 21 April 2008 – referral to Court of Criminal Appeal under s 79 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 – concession by Crown that appeal must succeed and conviction be quashed – whether verdict of acquittal or retrial should be ordered – undertaking by Crown not to call a compromised witness on retrial – evidence of that witness very important in original trial – whether remaining evidence capable of proving applicant guilty of murder – detailed analysis of evidence likely to be called at retrial – evidence unlikely to establish guilt of applicant – verdict of acquittal entered. Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) – s 15A Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) - s 78, s 79 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) - s 6(1), s 8(1) , s 79(1)(b) Cases Cited: Conway v R [2002] HCA 2; 209 CLR 203; 186 ALR 328; 76 ALJR 358 Gerakiteys v The Queen [1984] HCA 8; 153 CLR 317 Gilham v R [2012] NSWCCA 131; 224 A Crim R 22 Haoui v R [2008] NSWCCA 209; 188 A Crim R 331 JB – Application for inquiry into conviction pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (Supreme Court of NSW), R A Hulme J, 20 November 2014, unreported JB v R [2012] NSWCCA 12; 83 NSWLR 153 JB v The Queen [2013] HCA Trans 28 JB v R [2015] NSWCCA 182 JB v The Queen [2013] HCA Trans 28 Jiminez v The Queen [1992] HCA 14; (1992) 173 CLR 572 Justins v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 242; 204 A Crim R 315 King v The Queen [1986] HCA 59; 161 CLR 423 Mallard v The Queen [2005] HCA 68; 224 CLR 125 Parker v The Queen [1997] HCA 15; 186 CLR 494 R v RWB [2002] NSWCCA 504 R v Thomas (No 3) [2006] VSCA 300; 14 VR 512 R v Wilkes [1948] HCA 22; 77 CLR 511 R v Wilton (1981) 28 SASR 362; A Crim R 5 Spies v The Queen [2000] HCA; 201 CLR 603 The Queen v Taufahema [2007] HCA 11; 228 CLR 232 The Queen v Carroll [2002] HCA 55; 213 CLR 635 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JB – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr T Game SC/Ms G Bashir SC – Applicant Mr J Pickering SC – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate