NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MGB Building Pty Ltd v Hammond [2016] NSWCATAP 92 Hearing dates: 27 November 2015 Date of orders: 28 April 2016 Decision date: 28 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: S Westgarth, Deputy President T Simon, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed Catchwords: Whether sufficient findings of fact, whether evidence supported findings. Legislation Cited: The Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Home Building Act 1989 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Bellgrove v Eldridge [1954] HCA 36 Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth (1999) AER 268 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: MGB Building Pty Ltd (Appellant) Michael Bee (Appellant) Roger and Simone Hammond (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Davie (Appellant) G Carolan (Respondent)
Solicitors: Grant Spedding (Appellant) Harris and Harris (Respondent) File Number(s): AP 15/51663 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Citation: Unrestricted Date of Decision: 11 August 2015 Before: J Smith, Senior Member File Number(s): HB 13/13821 and HB 13/63879
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate