NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hart v Attorney-General for New South Wales [2016] NSWCCA 71 Hearing dates: 24 March 2016 Decision date: 02 May 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Harrison J at [2] Davies J at [3] Decision: (1) Extend time to the Applicant to file the Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal to 1 October 2015. (2) Leave to appeal granted. (3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence – perverting the course of justice – barrister making false statements to courts – judge-shopping – removal of matters from one court to another on the basis of false statements – statements made to achieve better outcome for client – five counts with five other charges on Form 1 – admissions made to ICAC inquiry – effect of High Court decision in ICAC v Cunneen on jurisdiction of ICAC to pursue inquiry involving applicant – whether Ellis discount should have been given – whether subjective matters accorded proper weight – whether issue of parity with comparative case – whether fixed term should have been imposed – whether discount for late plea adequate Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 (NSW) Independent Commission Against Corruption Amendment (Validation) Act 2015 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (No. 1 of 2002) [2002] NSWCCA 518; (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 Duncan v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2015] HCA 32; (2015) 89 ALJR 835 Hampton v R [2014] NSWCCA 131; 243 A Crim R 193 Independent Commission Against Corruption v Cunneen [2015] HCA 14; (2015) 89 ALJR 475 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; (2014) 252 CLR 601 New South Wales Bar Association v Hart [2006] NSWADT 97 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Nykolyn [2012] NSWCCA 219 R v Pham [2005] NSWCCA 94 R v Thompson [2005] NSWCCA 340; 156 A Crim R 467 The Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Hart [2009] NSWADT 252 Tsakonas v R [2009] NSWCCA 258; (2009) 197 A Crim R 581 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Peter Hart (Applicant) Attorney-General for New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) Mr S Corish (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate