NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wilson v Chan & Naylor Parramatta Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATCD 20 Hearing dates: 19 January 2016 Decision date: 05 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: P Boyce, Senior Member Decision: The application is dismissed Catchwords: Limitation period in contract and tort, cause of action, exercise of due care and skill in provision of supply of accounting services Legislation Cited: Consumer Claims Act 1998 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cwlth) Australian Consumer Law Cases Cited: Fairey Australasia Pty Ltd v Joyce and Another (1981) 2 NSWLR 314 Read v Brown (1882) 22 QBD 12, Cooke v Gill (1) 24 WR 710 Gibbs v Guild (1882) 9 QBD 59 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Applicant: Stephen Wilson Respondent: Chan & Naylor Parramatta as trustee for Chan & Naylor Parramatta Trust Representation: Applicant: Litigant in Person Respondent: Clive Nelson (Director) File Number(s): GEN 15/59854 Publication restriction: Unrestricted
reasons for decision The application 1. The applicant lodged an application with the Tribunal on 2 November 2015 seeking an order that the respondent pay to the applicant the amount of $40,000 being damages the applicant alleges that he suffered as a result of the respondent's negligence and breach of contract in providing financial advice. 2. The applicant is a financial adviser but brings this application in his own capacity as a consumer. 3. The respondent is a supplier of accounting services.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate