NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sharkey v Mayahi-Nissi (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 537 Hearing dates: 4, 5 April 2016 Date of orders: 29 April 2016 Decision date: 29 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Kunc J Decision: Amended notice of motion dismissed; Documents to be removed from file Catchwords: LEGAL PRACTITIONERS – Court's supervisory jurisdiction – Ex parte injunction in the nature of the writ of ne exeat colonia obtained by material misstatement – Whether counsel and solicitors should subsequently be restrained from acting
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Correspondence and submissions contain serious allegations of misconduct – Ultimately not pursued – Whether should be removed from Court file – UPCR Part 4 r 4.15 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Cases Cited: Bayer AG v Winter [1986] 1 WLR 497; [1986] 1 AllER 733 Cardile v Led Builders Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 18; (1999) 198 CLR 380 Danieletto v Khera, NSWSC, unreported, Bryson J, 17 February 1995, BC9504240 Elliott v Elliott [1975] 1 NSWLR 148 Glover v Walters [1950] HCA 1; (1950) 80 CLR 72 Jackson v Sterling Industries Limited [1987] HCA 23; (1987) 162 CLR 613 Kallinicos v Hunt [2005] NSWSC 1181; (2005) 64 NSWLR 561 Millennium Federation Pty Ltd v Bigjig Pty Ltd [1998] QCA 432; [2000] 1 QdR 275 Sleiman v Afeich [2005] NSWSC 1063 Sharkey v Nissi [2015] NSWSC 1266 Sharkey v Mayahi-Nissi [2015] NSWSC 104 Sharkey v Mayahi-Nissi No 2 [2015] NSWSC 132 Talacko v Talacko (No 2) [2009] VSC 444; (2009) 25 VR 613 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher James Sharkey (Plaintiff/Applicant) John Richard Cox, Timothy John Eakin, Michael Leo Stafford, Cain Russell Sarah and Mark Geoffrey Doble trading as Eakin McCaffery Cox Lawyers (First Respondent) Jonathan Hyde (Second Respondent) Donya Mayahi-Nissi (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P.E. King (Plaintiff/Applicant) G. Curtin SC and Dr R.P. Austin (First Respondent) D.A. McLure SC and D.F. Villa (Second Respondent) T. Lynch SC (Defendant/Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate