NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tsai Yu v R [2016] NSWCCA 73 Hearing dates: 21 April 2016 Date of orders: 04 May 2016 Decision date: 04 May 2016 Before: R A Hulme J at [1] Garling J at [2] Wilson J at [61] Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentencing – parity between co-offenders – where applicant and co-offender sentenced for possessing a commercial quantity of an unlawfully imported border control drug – where co-offender's role in the commission of the offence was greater than the applicant's – where the sentencing Judge imposed a lesser sentence on the applicant – whether the sentencing Judge gave proper consideration to the circumstances of the applicant and co-offender and their different degrees of criminality – whether the sentencing Judge failed properly to exercise the discretion reposed in her Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) (Criminal Code) Cases Cited: Green v The Queen, Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Lam v R; Lam v R [2015] NSWCCA 87 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 Postiglione v The Queen (1996) 189 CLR 295 Tatana v R [2006] NSWCCA 398 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tsai Yu (Applicant) Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr A Webb (Applicant) Mr L Fernandez (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate