NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Smith, Jarad [2016] NSWCCA 75 Hearing dates: 28 April 2016 Decision date: 28 April 2016 Before: McCallum J at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Schmidt J at [81] Decision: Crown appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against sentence – aggravated dangerous driving occasioning death – two counts – Crimes Act 1900 s 52A(2) – whether sentence manifestly inadequate – guilty pleas – further offence of failure to stop and assist taken into account – high objective seriousness and moral culpability – general deterrence of particular importance – favourable subjective circumstances – consideration of comparable cases and statistics confirms sentence within range – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 52A(2), 52AB(1) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) s 68A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A, 44(2B) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 5D Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) Ch 7 Pt 7.4 Div 1, s 206A Cases Cited: Berg v R [2004] NSWCCA 300 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales [2015] HCA 9; 317 ALR 308 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 79 NSWLR 1 Gommesen v R [2012] NSWCCA 226 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 244 CLR 520 Lawrence v R [2007] NSWCCA 349 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Munda v State of Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; 249 CLR 600 R v GWM [2012] NSWCCA 240 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49; 77 NSWLR 7 R v McKeown [2013] NSWDC 22 R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2 R v Morrow [2009] NSWDC 78 R v Pevy [2004] NSWCCA 414 R v Skrill [2002] NSWCCA 484 R v Smith [2005] NSWCCA 19 R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343; 55 NSWLR 252 R v Wright [2013] NSWCCA 82; 229 A Crim R 245 Skocic v R [2014] NSWCCA 225 Spark v R [2012] NSWCCA 140 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Jarad Michael Smith (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms M Cinque SC (Crown) Mr H Dhanji SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate