NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Brown v R [2016] NSWCCA 76 Hearing dates: 21 April 2016 Decision date: 04 May 2016 Before: R A Hulme J at [1]; Garling J at [86]; Wilson J at [90] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against conviction granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – drug supply – whether verdict unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence – where principal Crown witness is a co-offender – where there is no forensic evidence inculpating the applicant – a strong circumstantial case and objective evidence supports critical aspects of witness evidence – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 193B(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 5(1)(b) Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) ss 25, 29 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 165 Cases Cited: Glover v R; Stuart v R [2015] NSWCCA 285 Jones v The Queen [1997] HCA 56; 191 CLR 439 Libke v The Queen [2007] HCA 30; 230 CLR 559 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adam Campbell Brown (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Hughes SC (Applicant) Mr E Balodis (Crown)
Solicitors: Hardinlaw Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2012/257551 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 6 March 2015 Before: Whitford SC DCJ File Number(s): 2012/257551
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate