NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gmitrovic v Commonwealth of Australia (No2) [2016] NSWSC 546 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 02 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) Order the plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: COSTS Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Gmitrovic v Commonwealth of Australia [2016] NSWSC 418 Category: Costs Parties: Darko Gmitrovic (Plaintiff) Commonwealth of Australia (First Defendant) Danielle Pokoney (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff in person M Richardson (Defendants)
Solicitors: Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Defendants) File Number(s): 2014/325942
Judgment
Introduction 1. On 13 April 2016 I ordered that there be judgment for the defendants and published reasons for decision in Gmitrovic v Commonwealth of Australia [2016] NSWSC 418. I ordered that, subject to an application for a different order, the plaintiff pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings.
The parties' applications for costs orders 1. Mr Gmitrovic has applied for costs orders which are different from that proposed above. It appeared from his initial submission that he sought an order that the Commonwealth pay his costs of the proceedings; or, in the alternative, that the order be that each party bear his, or its, costs of the proceedings. However, he has since confirmed that his sole application is for an order that the defendants bear their own costs of the proceedings. 2. The defendants contended that the order proposed when judgment was delivered was the appropriate order. In support of their contention, the defendants tendered a Calderbank offer which they had made on 24 March 2016 (which was open for acceptance until 1 April 2016) in which the Commonwealth's solicitors made the following offer: Our client offers to pay you the amount of $45,000 inclusive of costs in full and final settlement of your claim. This offer is made without admission of liability and is subject to execution of a deed of release. 1. The Commonwealth, as part of the Calderbank offer, agreed to forego an order for costs in its favour in the sum of $1,500 if the offer was accepted. Mr Gmitrovic rejected the offer on 28 March 2016. The Commonwealth did not rely on the offer as supporting an application for an indemnity costs order; rather it submitted as follows: The Plaintiff's rejection of the Defendants' Calderbank offer plainly gives rise to an entitlement on the part of the Defendants to seek an order for indemnity costs from the date of that offer. In the sad circumstances of this case the Defendants have not given instructions for such an application to be made. The Defendants only now draw it to the Court's attention so that the Court may be made aware of another matter justifying the appropriateness and the fairness of the existing costs order.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate