NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Qaumi & Ors (No 28) [2016] NSWSC 552 Hearing dates: 2 May 2016 Date of orders: 03 May 2016 Decision date: 04 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: Hearsay evidence excluded (see paragraph [8])
Answer 200 admitted subject to deletion of the words "'cause my mum's really sick too" and "like I look like those guys in Parramatta that have steroids, or something. I walk, I look like I've got that in me and I'm walking like them." (see paragraphs [17]-[19]). Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – interview with child victim – vulnerable witness – evidence of injury and emotional impact of shooting on witness – hearsay – evidence of what child was told by doctors – evidence not admissible – evidence of impact of injuries – probative value – whether answer in the nature of a victim's impact statement – where no dispute as to element of grievous bodily harm – where no clear indication of formal admissions – evidence admissible Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Farhad Qaumi Mumtaz Qaumi Jamil Qaumi Mohammed Zarshoy Mohammed Kalal Representation: Counsel: K McKay & P Hogan (Crown) J Stratton SC & M Curry (F Qaumi) P Young SC (M Quami) N Carroll(J Quami) R Driels (Zarshoy) G Clarke (Kalal)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate