NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CDD v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 85 Hearing dates: 29 January 2016 Date of orders: 05 May 2016 Decision date: 05 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Leal, Senior Member B Field, General Member Decision: 1. The decision of the Children's Guardian dated 29 July 2015 to refuse to grant the applicant a working with children check clearance is set aside.
2. In substitution, the respondent is to grant the applicant a working with children check clearance. Catchwords: Administrative Law - review under s27 Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 - refusal of working with children check clearance – correct and preferable decision – sexual assault charges dismissed – whether applicant a real and appreciable risk to children. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 Cases Cited: AHV v NSW Commission for Children and Young People [2012] NSWADT 263 AYU v NSW Office of the Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 69 BJB v The Children's Guardian (No 2) [2014] NSWCATAD 163 Commission for Children and Young People v FZ [2011] NSWCA 111 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited [2010] HCA 32 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v QAAH of 2004 [2006] HCA 53; (2006) 231 CLR 1 R v Commission for Children and Young People [2002] NSWIRComm 101 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CDD (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Andelman (Applicant) A Douglas-Baker (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate