NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zaps Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd v PJG Warehousing & Distribution Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 97 Hearing dates: 15 April 2016 Date of orders: 09 May 2016 Decision date: 09 May 2016 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Payne JA at [7]; Emmett AJA at [110]. Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed; (2) The appellants are to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal. Catchwords: CONTRACT – sale of business – vendor entitled to interest on outstanding contract price unless in default – whether vendor in default by allegedly failing to make certain adjustments – CONTRACT – sale of business – vendor obliged to assist purchaser in certain respects – whether breach of contract –whether obligation required unilateral assistance absent request from purchaser – DAMAGES – whether evidence of causation and loss sufficient – PROCEDURE – whether new argument can be raised for first time on appeal Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 100 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 79 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 75A Cases Cited: Chapmans Ltd v Australian Stock Exchange Ltd (1996) 67 FCR 402 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337 Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Murry [1998] HCA 42; 193 CLR 605 Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 54; 174 CLR 64 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21; 243 CLR 588 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd [2014] HCA 7; 251 CLR 640 Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 61; 233 CLR 115 Laurinda Pty Ltd v Capalaba Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd [1989] HCA 23; 166 CLR 623 Placer (Granny Smith) Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 10; 77 ALJR 768; 196 ALR 257 Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL [1994] HCA 4; 179 CLR 332 Shevill v Builders Licensing Board [1982] HCA 47; 149 CLR 620 State of Victoria v Tatts Group Limited [2016] HCA 5 Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon [2003] HCA 48; 200 ALR 447 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Zaps Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd (First Appellant) John Zappia (Second Appellant) PJG Warehousing & Distribution Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Good Deal Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Storetrans Pty Ltd (Third Respondent) Peter Gooding (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Angyal SC (Appellants) S Docker (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate