Application by Darush Majid pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) [2016] NSWSC 561

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Darush Majid pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) [2016] NSWSC 561 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 03 May 2016 Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Whole case referred to the Court of Criminal Appeal to be dealt with as an appeal against sentence under the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW). Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – whether Muldrock-error – whether Kentwell error Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Pt 7 Div 3, s 79 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 44(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Application by Darush Majid pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2014] NSWSC 709 Buttrose v Attorney General of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 221 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Liles v R (Cth) [2014] NSWCCA 289 Majid v R [2010] NSWCCA 121 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 383; 85 NSWLR 783 Youssef v R [2014] NSWCCA 285 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Darush Majid (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: Ms G Bashir SC and Ms J Roy (Applicant) Ms B Baker (Attorney General)