NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Thompson Kimura and William Rodney Swan (No 1) [2016] NSWSC 568 Hearing dates: 05 May 2016 Decision date: 06 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: N Adams J Decision: (1) Photographs showing non-tested areas of staining on accused Swan's shorts admissible. (2) Evidence of opinion that those areas of staining are blood inadmissible. (3) Actual shorts admissible. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – application to exclude evidence under s 137 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – where photographs of shorts worn by accused Swan show several areas of staining – where only one stain tested for blood or DNA – probative value of evidence of other similar stains in circumstances where possibility of secondary transference raised – whether evidence unfairly prejudicial – evidence of staining admissible – evidence of crime scene officer's opinion inadmissible Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 137 Cases Cited: Papakosmas v R (1999) 196 CLR 297 Mundarra Smith v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 650 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Thompson Kimura William Rodney Swan Representation: Counsel: M Cunneen SC (Crown) M Dennis (Accused Swan) C Bruce SC (Accused Kimura)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Blair Criminal Laywers (Accused Swan) NSW Legal Aid (Accused Kimura) File Number(s): 2013/00117926; 2013/00117929 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate