NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shipman v R [2016] NSWCCA 83 Hearing dates: 4 May 2016 Date of orders: 04 May 2016 Decision date: 09 May 2016 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; R S Hulme AJ at [53] Decision: Leave to appeal against sentence refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – drug supply and firearm offences – supply commercial quantity of methamphetamine – no error in assessment of principal offence as in the mid-range of seriousness – criminality of different offences correctly considered discretely – no error in approach to sentencing regarding drug quantities – leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 44 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 166 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason Wayne Shipman (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Segal (Applicant) Ms M Cinque SC (Crown)
Solicitors: Hugo Schleiger Lawyer Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2014/106835 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 24 March 2015 Before: Baly SC DCJ File Number(s): 2014/106835
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate