NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Qaumi & Ors (No 29) [2016] NSWSC 569 Hearing dates: 5 May 2016 Date of orders: 05 May 2016 Decision date: 05 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: Application for discharge of jury refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for discharge of jury – where counsel for co-accused elicits potentially prejudicial evidence – "stand over bloke" – "got out of gaol" – where counsel misapprehended interview – failure to object to evidence not relevant to discharge application – potential for prejudice – no clear identification of accused – minor incident in a lengthy trial – potential prejudice cured by direction Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Farhad Qaumi Mumtaz Qaumi Jamil Qaumi Mohammed Zarshoy Mohammed Kalal Representation: Counsel: K McKay & P Hogan (Crown) J Stratton SC & M Curry (F Qaumi) P Young SC (M Quami) N Carroll(J Quami) R Driels (Zarshoy) G Clarke (Kalal)
Solicitors: Solicitor for the NSW DPP(Crown) Archbold Legal (F Qaumi) George Sten& Co (M Quami) Bannisters Lawyers (J Quami) Zahr Lawyers (Zarshoy) Hallak Law (Kalal) File Number(s): Farhad Quami - 2014/6809; 2014/315201; 2014/315252Mumtaz Quami – 2014/6813; 2014/315251; 2014/315260Jamil Quami - 2013/336086; 2014/18164; 2014315253Mohammad Zarshoy – 2014/316236Mohammad Kalal - 2013/344739; 2014/66939 Publication restriction: No publication until the conclusion of the trial.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate