NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Martin v Hume Coal Pty Ltd [2016] NSWLEC 51 Hearing dates: 30 March 2016 Date of orders: 10 May 2016 Decision date: 10 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 8 Before: Preston CJ Decision: Orders as set out at [121] Catchwords: APPEAL – appeal against Commissioner for Mining's decision on questions of law – exploration licence – "rights conferred by the licence" – whether accessing land to prospect is a right conferred by licence – "significant improvement" – whether certain works and structures are significant improvements – formed roads and driveways – paddocks with improved pastures – equestrian cross-country event course – cattle laneways – irrigation piping – fences – Commissioner's determination that accessing land for prospecting not an exercise of rights an error of law – Commissioner's consequent determination of no jurisdiction to determine whether particular structures or works significant improvements an error of law – Commissioner's determination that certain works and structures not significant improvements were errors of law
WORDS AND PHRASES – "rights conferred by the licence" – Mining Act 1992, s 31 – "significant improvement" – Mining Act 1992 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98 Interpretation Act 1987 ss 34, 35 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A Mining Act 1992 ss 22, 29, 31, 142, 383B, Pts 3, 8, Sch 1, Sch 2 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 42.1, Sch 1 Cases Cited: Goode v The Valuer General (1979) 22 SASR 247 Kayuga Coal Pty Ltd v Ducey [2000] NSWCA 54 Lightning Ridge Miners Association Ltd v Slack-Smith [2013] NSWLEC 1063 Martin & Ors v Hume Coal Pty Ltd [2015] NSWLEC 1461 Parramatta City Council v Brickworks Ltd (1972) 128 CLR 1 Parramatta City Council v Shell Company of Australia Ltd [1972] 1 NSWLR 483; (1972) 26 LGRA 25 Ulan Coal Mines Ltd v Minister for Mineral Resources [2007] NSWSC 1299 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Peter Martin (First Applicant) Mr Phillip Pollicina (Second Applicant) Fesen Pty Ltd (Third Applicant) Mr Ross Alexander (Fourth Applicant) Ms Kathleen Roche (Fifth Applicant) Hume Coal Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr B W Walker SC with Mr R D White (Applicants) Mr R C Beasley SC with Ms A F Knox (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate