NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Sigalla [2016] NSWSC 585 Hearing dates: 6 May 2016 Decision date: 10 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: Notice of Motion filed 4 May 2016 is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application to vacate trial date and stay proceedings - Dietrich application - reliance on affidavit of solicitor on information and belief - no affidavit of Applicant - not established that Applicant is indigent - application to adjourn trial to obtain funds for legal representation - similar application previously refused - application to vacate trial refused Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Dietrich v The Queen [1992] HCA 57; 177 CLR 292 R (Cth) v Petroulias (No 13) [2007] NSWSC 535 R v Sigalla [2016] NSWSC 465 Texts Cited: --- Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Andrew John Sigalla (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms P McDonald SC; Ms S Callan (Crown) Mr G O'L Reynolds SC; Mr PD Lange (Accused)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) --- (Accused) File Number(s): 2013/151155; 2013/355116 Publication restriction: Restricted - trial pending. On 22 November 2016, a jury returned verdicts of guilty upon 24 counts under s.184(2)(a) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Sentence was passed for these offences on 10 February 2017: R v Sigalla [2017] NSWSC 52. In these circumstances, the non-publication order made on 10 May 2016 was lifted.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate