NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Boyd v Catherine Margaret Thorn as executrix of the estate of the late Betty McAuley [2016] NSWSC 588 Hearing dates: 7 April 2016 Decision date: 11 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: White J Decision: Refer to para [41] of judgment. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — Application to set aside declarations and orders pursuant to UCPR r 36.15 — Declarations of constructive trust and equitable charge made over property co-owned by the plaintiff — Plaintiff not a party when declarations made — Whether judgment given or orders made irregularly — Whether declarations and orders made directly affecting rights and liabilities of a non-party — Whether declarations and orders to be set aside as of right —Declarations and orders set aside Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cameron v Cole (1944) 68 CLR 571 Catherine Margaret Thorn as executrix of the estate of the late Betty McAuley v Ian Geoffrey Boyd [2014] NSWSC 1159 Craig v Kanssen [1943] KB 256 Deloughery v Weston [2010] NSWCA 148 John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Limited [2010] HCA 19; (2010) 241 CLR 1 Miltonbrook Pty Ltd v Westbury Holdings Kiama Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 38; (2008) 71 NSWLR 262 News Limited v ARL Victoria v Sutton (1998) 195 CLR 291 News Limited v Australian Rugby Football League Limited (1996) 64 FCR 410 Onefone Australia Pty Limited v One.Tel Ltd (in liq) [2010] NSWSC 586 Pegang Mining Co Limited v Choong Sam [1969] 2 MLJ 52 Perpetual Trustees Australia Limited v Heperu Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2009] NSWCA 387; (2009) 78 NSWLR 190 Pralle v Scharka [1978] 2 NSWLR 450 Szanto v Bainton [2012] NSWSC 60 Taylor v Taylor (1979) 143 CLR 1 Thorn as executrix of the estate of the late Betty McAuley v Boyd (No. 2) [2015] NSWSC 199 Texts Cited: Peter Butt, Land Law, 6th ed, Thomson Reuters Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Dawn Kathleen Boyd (Plaintiff) Catherine Margaret Thorn as executrix of the estate of the late Betty McAuley (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: In Person (Plaintiff) V Brigden (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/91811
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate