NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Re Application of Dr Guy Kingsley Herron [2016] NSWCATOD 59 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 12 May 2016 Decision date: 12 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Boland ADCJ, Deputy President Decision: 1.Under s 163 (1) (a1) of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law the Medical Council of NSW is designated as the appropriate review body to review conditions placed on the registration of Dr Guy Kingsley Herron by the former Medical Tribunal of NSW on 1 March 2013. 2. No order as to costs Catchwords: HEALTH PRACTITITONER REGULATION NATIONAL LAW – where medical practitioner seeks to have conditions placed his registration by former Medical Tribunal of NSW reviewed by the Medical Council of NSW rather than the Tribunal – HELD Medical Council is the appropriate review body. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Amendment (Review) Act 2016 Cases Cited: Bar-Mordecai v Medical Council of NSW [2014] NSWCATOD 142 Rachel Coe v HCCC [2013] NSWNMT 11 Trad v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 80 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dr Guy Kingsley Herron (Applicant) Representation: Solicitors: TressCox Lawyers (Applicant) C Fesel (Medical Council of NSW) File Number(s): 1620018 Publication restriction: Nil
reasons for decision
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate