NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Brooks v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd; Brooks v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 604 Hearing dates: 6 May 2016 Date of orders: 10 May 2016 Decision date: 10 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Application by defendant in Fairfax proceedings to have proceedings heard together with Channel Nine proceedings refused; Fairfax to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the application; Fairfax to pay Channel Nine's costs of the application. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to have related defamation proceedings heard together – where proceedings involve differently drafted imputations but common questions of fact – delay – where each proceeding already listed for hearing on different dates – prejudice to plaintiffs in losing junior counsel long briefed in the matter – prejudice to defendant in related proceedings in losing usual right of an independent approach Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Neil Brooks (First Plaintiff) Elle Brooks (Second Plaintiff) Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (Defendant in 2014/376115 proceedings) TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (Defendant in 2013/66299 proceedings) Representation: Counsel: K Smark SC, S Chrysanthou (Plaintiffs) ATS Dawson (Defendant in Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd proceedings) M Richardson (Defendant in TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd proceedings)
Solicitors: Kalantzis Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Banki Haddock Fiora (Defendant in Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd proceedings) Johnson, Winter & Slattery (Defendant in TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd proceedings)) File Number(s): 20143/761152013/66299 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate