NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Alucity Architectural Product Supply Pty Ltd -v- Australian Solutions Centre; Alucity Architectural Product Supply Pty Ltd -v- Paul J Hick [2016] NSWSC 608 Hearing dates: 28 April 2016 Decision date: 13 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: Proceedings dismissed Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – EQUITY – UNJUST ENRICHMENT – total failure of consideration – Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) s 13 (5), s 19, s 22, s 28, s 29 – where a claimant makes a payment claim and then applies for adjudication – where the respondent to the payment claim argues that it is invalid under s 13(5) because it is the second claim in relation to a reference date under a building contract – where the adjudication application is referred by the authorised nominating authority to an adjudicator who accepts appointment and then determines that the payment claim is invalid and as a result he has no jurisdiction to determine the claim – whether the fees paid to the nominating authority and adjudicator are recoverable by the claimant on the basis that there has been a total failure of consideration and the authority and the adjudicator will be unjustly enriched if they are entitled to retain the fees paid to them – HELD: the doctrine of total failure of consideration has no application in the circumstances - the authority and the adjudicator have not been enriched and it is not unjust for them to retain the fees – no claim for restitution lies Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alucity Architectural Product Supply Pty Ltd - Plaintiff Australian Solutions Centre Pty Ltd Paul J Hick Representation: Counsel: P Davenport, Solicitor – Plaintiff F P Hicks – For the authority and the adjudicator
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate