NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Humphries v R; Ponfield v R (No. 2) [2016] NSWCCA 91 Hearing dates: 13 May 2016 Decision date: 16 May 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Davies J at [1] Beech-Jones J [1] Decision: (1) The reference at [5] in the principal judgment to "18 January 2021" is amended to read "18 April 2021";
(2) The reference at [7] in the principal judgment to "18 June 2017" is amended to read"18 March 2017";
(3) Order (3) at [73] and in the form of the sentence ordered by the Court on 13 May 2016 is amended to read:
In lieu, sentence the Appellant Mark Humphries to a sentence for each count comprising a non-parole period of three years nine months commencing 19 January 2015 and expiring 18 October 2018 with an additional term of two years and three months expiring 18 January 2021. The sentences are to be served concurrently.
(4) The orders republished on 16 May 2016 stand as a consolidated statement of the orders of the Court. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – errors in judgment – correction pursuant to r 50C Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Rules 1952 (NSW) Cases Cited: Humphries v R; Ponfield v R [2016] NSWCCA 86 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mark Wayne Humphries (Applicant) Wade Allan Ponfied (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Segal (for the Applicant Humphries) W Hunt & J Paingakulam (for the Applicant Ponfield) H Baker (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate