NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Weismantel (No 4) [2015] NSWDC 389 Hearing dates: 26 June 2015 Date of orders: 26 June 2015 Decision date: 26 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Leave granted
Order that accused be tried by Judge alone Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Practice and procedure – Application for leave to apply for trial by Judge alone – Accused putting Crown to proof – Evidence of most witnesses to be adduced via statements – No issue of credit – No factual issue requiring the application of objective community standards – Issue of the accused's mental state and his ability to give attention to a lengthy trial – Need for a form of trial that meets the requirements of an accused's medical condition - Accused may not recollect why or in what circumstances or how the offence was committed – In the interests of justice that reasoned explanation of why or why not the accused might be guilty of the offence
CRIMINAL LAW – Practice and procedure – Application for leave to apply for trial by Judge alone – Question of whether the harm inflicted upon the victim was grievous bodily harm or actual bodily harm is necessarily a matter for a jury – Judge with some experience in the field can adequately determine that matter as well as a jury can or ought or would Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Mental Health Act 2007 Cases Cited: R v Belghar [2012] NSWCCA 86 R v Dean [2013] NSWSC 661 R v King [2013] NSWSC 448 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Blake Weismantel (Applicant/Accused) Crown (Respondent/Crown) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Schaudin (Applicant/Accused) Mr P Kerr (Respondent/Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate