NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Le v Tran [2016] NSWSC 632 Hearing dates: 24 February 2016 Date of orders: 18 May 2016 Decision date: 18 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: Judgment:
(1) It is adjudged that the plaintiff have possession of the property described in paragraph 1 of the statement of claim.
The Court orders that:
(2) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff the sum of $99,070.96. (3) The cross claim is dismissed. (4) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings, including the costs of the cross claim. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – possession of land – failure to pay rent and option payments – notices of default and termination of rental and option agreements served – defendant has not demonstrated why agreements should be set aside – option fees, rent and mesne profits to date of judgment payable Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Regulation 2010 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; 151 CLR 447 Lamru Pty Ltd v Kation Pty Ltd (1998) 44 NSWLR 432 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191; 42 ALR 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Philip Le (Plaintiff) Thanh Hue Tran (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: N Allan (Plaintiff) Thanh Hue Tran (Defendant) (In person)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate