NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: RACQ Insurance Ltd v Roebuck [2013] NSWSC 2056 Hearing dates: 22 May 2013 Date of orders: 23 May 2013 Decision date: 23 May 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (1) Dismiss the Summons. (2) The First Plaintiff is to pay the Defendant's costs. Catchwords: COURTS – cross-vesting – motor vehicle accident on Gold Coast highway in Queensland – proceedings commenced in District Court in New South Wales – application by defendant to cross-vest proceedings to Queensland – doctors located in both Queensland and New South Wales – whether difference in approach to calculation of damages in the two states - delay if proceedings transferred – cross-vesting refused Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 Motor Accidents Act 1988 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: BHP Billiton v Schultz (2004] HCA 61; (2004) 221 CLR 400 British American Tobacco Australian Services Limited v Laurie (2009) NSWSC 83 James Hardie v Barry [2000] NSWCA 353; (2000) 50 NSWLR 357 Reid v Wright (2012) NSWSC 1149 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RACQ Insurance Ltd (First Plaintiff) Kelly-Ann Hall (Second Plaintiff) Matthew Roebuck (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A J Bowen (Plaintiffs) G M Radburn (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate