NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hull [2016] NSWSC 634 Hearing dates: 17 March 2016 Date of orders: 03 June 2016 Decision date: 03 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (a) in respect of Count 1 on the indictment I sentence you to a period of imprisonment of six months commencing 3 June 2016 and expiring 2 December 2016;
(b) in respect of Count 2 I sentence you to a period of imprisonment of ten months commencing 3 September 2016 and expiring 2 July 2017;
(c) in respect of Count 3 and taking into account the offence on the s 16BA schedule I sentence you to a period of eleven months commencing 3 December 2016 and expiring 2 November 2017.
(d) I order that you be released after serving a period of seven months imprisonment upon giving security by way of recognisance in the sum of $1,000 to be of good behaviour for a period of 18 months commencing on 2 January 2017. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – insider trading offences – guilty pleas – offences assessed below the midrange of seriousness – offender as tippee – offending over a five month period – three different target companies – substantial investments - early pleas and co-operation with law enforcement agencies – effect of sentence on family of offender - exceptional circumstances demonstrated – wife's serious mental health issues – offender not an Australian citizen and liable to deportation – remorse demonstrated – strong subjective case - sentence of imprisonment warranted Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions v Zhuang [2015] VSCA 96 DPP (Cth) v Gregory [2011] VSCA 145; [2011] 34 VR 1; 211 A Crim R 147 Kamay v R [2015] VSCA 296; (2015) 109 ACSR 611 Khoo v R [2013] NSWCCA 323; (2013) 237 A Crim R 221 Markovic v The Queen [2010] VSCA 105; (2010) 200 A Crim R 510 R v Glynatsis [2013] NSWCCA 131; (2013) 230 A Crim R 99 R v Hartman [2010] NSWSC 1422; (2010) 81 ACSR 121 R v Jones [2004] VSCA 68 R v Pogson, Lapham & Martin [2012] NSWCCA 225; (2012) 82 NSWLR 60 R v Richard [2011] NSWSC 866 R v Scook [2008] WASCA 114 R v Zerafa [2013] NSWCCA 222; (2013) 235 A Crim R 265 Sabra v R [2015] NSWCCA 38 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown Michael William Hull Representation: Counsel: L Crowley (Crown) T Game SC & S Buchen (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate