NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Alex Jimenez under s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2016] NSWSC 635 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 17 May 2016 Decision date: 17 May 2016 Before: Garling J Decision: Pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001, I refer the whole case to the Court of Criminal Appeal to be dealt with as an appeal under the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for inquiry into conviction – Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001, s 78 – where applicant convicted of possessing child abuse material under s 91H(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 – where applicant pleaded guilty on erroneous advice that "child" within the meaning of s 91H(2) is a person under the age of 18 years – where Local Court and District Court erroneously proceeded on basis that "child" within the meaning of s 91H(2) is a person under the age of 18 years – whether doubt or question as to the applicant's guilt Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251 Meissner v The Queen [1995] HCA 41; (1995) 184 CLR 132 R v Hawker [2005] NSWCCA 118 R v Wilkes [2001] NSWCCA 97 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alex Jimenez (Applicant) File Number(s): 2016/28255 Publication restriction: Not Applicable
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate