NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Oppidan Homes Pty Ltd v Baldwin and Granofsky [2016] NSWCATAP 109 Hearing dates: 14 March 2016 Date of orders: 18 May 2016 Decision date: 18 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: S Westgarth, Deputy President D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is granted in part. 2. Appeal upheld in part. 3. The order for payment of the sum of $24,723.00 is set aside. 4. The proceedings are remitted to the Tribunal constituted as previously for: (a) Determination of the Respondent's liability to the Appellant in respect of the eight items identified in paragraph 11 of the reasons; (b) Correction of the calculation of the amount owing by the Respondents to the Appellant for electrical work; (c) The making of orders for the payment of the amount found to be due by the Respondents to the Appellant. 5. No order as to costs. Catchwords: Home Building – Error of law - determination that claims not supported by evidence – Tribunal Member failing to take evidence into account Issue not raised or argued below – whether issue can be raised on appeal Respondent's challenge to factual findings – whether permissible in absence of error of law Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Home Building Act 1989 Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 CPD Holdings Pty Ltd t/as The Bathroom Exchange v Baguley [2015] NSWCATAP 21 Drivas v Burrows [2014] NSWCATAP 87 Nelmeer Ashfield v Farah [2015] NSWCATAP 252 eMove Pty Ltd v Naomi Dickinson [2015] NSWCATAP 94 Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 120 203 Castlereagh Street v Skybloo Holdings (No.3) [2015] NSWCATAP 240 Mamo v Surace (2014) 86 NSWLR 275 Owners Strata Plan 76674 v Di Blasio Constructions [2014] NSWSC 1067 Owners Strata Plan 73162 v Dyldam Developments [2014] NSWSC 1789 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Wilson v Commissioner of Police [2015] NSWCATAP 248 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Oppidan Homes Pty Ltd (Appellant) Mark Baldwin and Margery Granofsky (Respondents) Representation: Counsel: R Zikmann (Appellant R Notley (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate