Waterhouse v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2016] NSWCA 116

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Waterhouse v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2016] NSWCA 116 Hearing dates: 16 May 2016 Decision date: 19 May 2016 Before: Simpson JA Decision: (1) The Notice of Motion of 10 May 2016 is dismissed. (2) The applicant is to pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Notice of Motion – 15 substantive orders sought in relation to pending application for leave to appeal – additional order sought that costs be paid on indemnity basis – no legal or other basis for orders sought – Notice of Motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 316 Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 (NSW), s 11 Cases Cited: Waterhouse v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2014] NSWSC 424 Waterhouse v Independent Commission Against Corruption (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 261 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Martin Otto Waterhouse (Applicant) Independent Commission Against Corruption (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) P Herzfeld (Respondent)

Solicitors: Waterhouse Solicitors (Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 2015/113041

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]