NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Furlong v Wise & Young Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 647 Hearing dates: 6 and 13 May 2016 Decision date: 19 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Expedition List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Defendants and proposed cross-claimants to pay costs thrown away by proposed cross-claim; solicitor for those parties to pay those costs if unpaid in time specified Catchwords: COSTS – allegations of dishonesty and serious misconduct made in proposed cross-claim without proper basis – whether solicitor should pay the costs thrown away Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015 (NSW) Practice Note SC Gen 5 Cases Cited: Re Bauhaus Pyrmont Pty Ltd (in Liq) [2006] NSWSC 879 Karwala v Skrzypczak Re Estate of Ratajcak [2007] NSWSC 931 Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd [1992] HCA 28; 174 CLR 178 Re Felicity; FM v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (No 4) [2015] NSWCA 19 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Kathleen Jeanne Furlong (First Plaintiff) Mark Andrew Furlong (Second Plaintiff) Wise & Young Pty Limited (First Defendant) Defined Properties Investment Pty Limited (Second Defendant) Wyse & Young International Pty Limited (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Auld (Plaintiffs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate