NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Citigroup Pty Limited v Hoocass Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 656 Hearing dates: 20 May 2016 Date of orders: 20 May 2016 Decision date: 20 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Lindsay J Decision: Orders for dismissal of a notice of motion for summary disposal of a cross claim, subject to a grant of leave to amend the cross claim to clarify a particular aspect of the cross claimant's case. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – Civil Proceedings – Motions, interlocutory applications and other pre-trial matters - Strike Out Motion
TRADE PRACTICES – Misleading and deceptive conduct – Damages – Causation – Indirect causation – Direct reliance on contravening conduct not required Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW Cases Cited: Brimson v Rocla Concrete Pipes Pty Limited [1982] 2 NSWLR 937 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 at 91 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) 1964 112 CLR 125 at 129-130 Hampic Pty Limited v Adams [1999] NSWCA 455 at [35] and [38]-[40] Janssen-Gilag Pty Limited v Pfizer Pty Limited (1992) 37 FCR 526 Re HIH Insurance Ltd (In Liq) [2016] NSWSC 482 Texts Cited: - Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Second Defendant/Cross Claimant: Anthony Bruce Hooper Second Cross Defendant: Mark O'Neill Valuations Pty Ltd ACN 003 308923 Third Cross Defendant: Mark O'Neill Representation: Counsel: Second Defendant/Cross Claimant: DD Knoll Second and Third Cross Defendants: MT McCulloch SC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate