NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Mitchell [2016] NSWCATOD 66 Hearing dates: 19 February 2016 Date of orders: 25 May 2016 Decision date: 25 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Boland ADCJ, Deputy President Decision: The Registrar is requested to provide to Senior Member McIllhatton a copy of these reasons for decision for her consideration of amendment under s 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW). No order as to costs. Catchwords: HEALTH PRACTITIONER REGULATION NATIONAL LAW – Where error in Tribunal's decision – whether amenable to correction under any provision of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW). Consideration of the principles enunciated in Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2002] HCA 11; 209 CLR 597; 187 ALR 117, 76 ALJR 598. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Architects Act 2003 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulations 2013 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Angius v Salier [2015] NSWSC 1446 Bass v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd [1999] HCA 9 Burrell v The Queen [2008] HCA 34 Chandler v Alberta Association of Architects (1989) 2 SCR 848 G v G [2016] NSWSC 511 HCCC v Ostendorf (No 2) [2016] NSWCATOD 44 Li v Ward Building Constructions Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 104 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2002] HCA 11; 209 CLR 597; 187 ALR 117, 76 ALJR 598 Newmont Yandel Operations Pty Ltd v The J Aron Corporation & The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc [2007] NSWCA 195 Quach v NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal [2015] NSWCA 63 Riverina Wines Pty Ltd v Registrar of the Workers Compensation Commission of NSW & ors [2007] NSWCA 149 Trad v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 80 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Geoffrey Norman Mitchell (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Talbert (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate