NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Amaca Pty Limited; Amaca Pty Limited v CSR Limited [2016] NSWDDT 2 Hearing dates: 9/2/2015; 10/2/2015; 11/2/2015; 12/2/2015; 2/11/2015; 3/11/2015; 4/11/2015; 5/11/2015; 6/11/2015; 5/2/2016; 8/2/2016; 9/2/2016; 10/2/2016; 11/2/2016; 12/2/2016; 15/2/2016; 16/2/2016; 17/2/2016; 18/2/2016 Date of orders: 20 May 2016 Decision date: 20 May 2016 Before: Kearns J Decision: In the State's claims against Amaca, I rule that the liability those parties are to bear is to be borne between them as follows: in the case of Mr Derepas, the State 75%, Amaca 25%; in the case of Mr Lewis, the State 60%, Amaca 40%; in the case of Mr Pajkovic, the State 65%, Amaca 35%; in the case of Mr Daly, the State 70%, Amaca 30%; in the case of Mr Allars, the State 65%, Amaca 35%; in the case of Mr Bennett, the State 70%, Amaca 30%; in the case of Mr Smith, the State 90%, Amaca 10%; in the case of Mr Payne, the State 65%, Amaca 35%.
In Amaca's claims against CSR, I rule that the amount Amaca is entitled to recover from CSR is represented by the total of the following: in the case of Mr Lewis, 50% of two thirds of the amount Amaca is required to pay to the State; in the case of Mr Pajkovic, 45% of the amount Amaca is required to pay to the State; in the case of Mr Daly, 40% of the amount Amaca is required to pay to the State; in the case of Mr Allars, 50% of the amount Amaca is required to pay to the State; in the case of Mr Bennett, 50% of the amount Amaca is required to pay to the State; in the case of Mr Smith, 50% of the amount Amaca is required to pay to the State; in the case of Mr Payne, 40% of the amount Amaca is required to pay to the State. Legislation Cited: Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 Cases Cited: Amaca Pty Ltd (under NSW External Administration) v A B & P Constructions Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 220 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 CSR Limited v Wren (1998) Aust Torts Reports 81-461 Evans v Amaca Pty Limited & Ors 26 February 2009 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 McPherson's Ltd v Eaton & Ors [2005] NSWCA 435 Norton Australia Pty Limited v Streets Ice Cream Pty Limited (1968) 120 CLR 635 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd 1985 ALR 529 Rolls Royce Industrial Power (Pacific) Ltd v James Hardie & Co Pty Ltd re Hay (No 4) (1999) 18 NSW CCR 653 (re McCullagh) Seltsam Pty Ltd v The State of Queensland [2003] NSWDDT 3 The Council of the Shire of Wyong v Shirt & Ors (1980) 146 CLR 40 Zwiersen v Field & Hall Ltd & Ors [2016] VSC 16 Texts Cited: M R Becklake, 'Asbestos-Related Diseases for the Lung and Other Organs: Their Epidemiology and Implications for Clinical Practice' (1976) 114(1) American Review of Respiratory Diseases 187 J C Wagner, C A Sleggs, and P Marchand, 'Diffuse Pleural Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure in the North Western Cape Province' (1960) 17(4) British Journal of Industrial Medicine 260 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales, plaintiff/cross claimant Amaca Pty Limited, first defendant/cross claimant/first cross defendant Wallaby Grip Limited, second defendant/second cross defendant Wallaby Grip (BAE) Pty Limited, defendant/second defendant/third defendant/second cross defendant/third cross defendant CSR Limited, cross-defendant Representation: Counsel: Mr J L Maconachie QC with Mr J L Sharpe, instructed by Thompson Cooper Lawyers Pty Ltd, appeared for the plaintiff Mr T G R Parker SC instructed by Mills Oakley appeared for the first defendant/cross claimant Mr D J Russell SC with Ms T Moisidis, instructed by Zambra Legal, appeared for the second and third defendants Mr D Miller of Colin Biggers & Paisley appeared for the cross defendant File Number(s): 64/2013; 64/2013/1; 65/2013; 65/2013/1; 89/2013; 89/2013/1; 89/2013/3; 126/2013/1; 126/2013/2; 272/2013; 272/2013/1; 419/2013/1; 419/2013/2; 246/2014/1; 334/2014/1; 334/2014/2
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate