NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Stankovic v Magee trading as Armstrong Legal [2016] NSWCA 125 Hearing dates: 17 May 2016 Decision date: 17 May 2016 Before: Basten JA at [14], [22]; Leeming JA at [21]; Simpson JA at [1] Decision: (1) To the extent necessary, the time in which to appeal be extended to 6 April 2016;
(2) Appeal dismissed;
(3) The appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – debt recovery proceedings in District Court – debt involved costs payable to solicitors acting in Family Court proceedings – defence and cross-claim alleging failure to carry out instructions – payment said to be contingent on events which did not occur – construction of costs agreement – challenge to findings of fact – no issue of principle Legislation Cited: District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Cases Cited: Stankovic v Peter Michael Magee t/as Armstrong Legal [2014] NSWSC 873 Stankovic v The Hills Shire Council [2015] NSWCA 279 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Milovan Stankovic (Appellant) Peter Michael Magee trading as Armstrong Legal (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Appellant) S Clemmett (Respondent)
Solicitors: Not applicable (Appellant) Armstrong Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): 2015/380972 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 10 December 2015 Before: Kearns DCJ File Number(s): 2013/134399
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate