NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tobia v R [2016] NSWCCA 99 Hearing dates: 21 April 2016 Date of orders: 21 April 2016 Decision date: 27 May 2016 Before: R A Hulme J at [1] Garling J at [2] Wilson J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal allowed. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal - parity – disparity of sentence between applicant and co-offender - co-offender's sentence suspended to undertake Drug Court program – whether justifiable sense of grievance – whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) Drug Court Regulation 2015 (NSW) Cases Cited: England v R; Phanith v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 McMullen v R [2013] NSWCCA 261 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Loh v R [2013] NSWCCA 339 R v Dinsdale [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Scicluna v R [2008] NSWCCA 24; (2008) 181 A Crim R 133 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Evin Tobia (Applicant) Crown Representation: Counsel: W Hunt (Applicant) E Balodis (Crown, Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/151921 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 02 April 2015 Before: Culver DCJ File Number(s): 2014/151921
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate