NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tedesco v Woollahra Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1202 Hearing dates: 26-27 May 2016 Date of orders: 27 May 2016 Decision date: 27 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Fakes C Decision: Appeal upheld subject to conditions see [56] Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Alterations and additions to a heritage item; setbacks; visual and acoustic privacy Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014 Cases Cited: Zhang v Canterbury Council [2001] NSWCA 167 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aini Tedesco (Applicant) Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Applicant: Mr G Green (Solicitor) Respondent: Ms M Hawley (Solicitor)
Solicitors: Applicant: Pikes & Verekers Lawyers Respondent: Lindsay Taylor Lawyers File Number(s): 151752 of 2016
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: The applicant appeals Woollahra Municipal Council's refusal of a development application for alterations, additions and associated works to a dwelling and land located at 13 Cove Street, Watsons Bay (the site). 2. The appeal is made pursuant to s 97(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act). 3. The matter commenced on site with a mandatory conciliation under s 34AA(2)(a) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (Court Act). As council officers did not have the delegation to enter into an agreement under s 34(3) of the Court Act, the conciliation was terminated and the parties consented to me determining the matter on the basis of what occurred at the conciliation conference in accordance with s 34AA(2)(b)(ii) and on the materials filed with the Court.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate