NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Turnbull (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 678 Hearing dates: 18 March 2016 Date of orders: 18 March 2016 Decision date: 18 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Johnson J Decision: Documents caught by the subpoena to be produced to the Court for inspection to determine whether access should be granted to the parties. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – murder trial - defence to rely upon partial defences of substantial impairment and extreme provocation - subpoena issued for Accused - claim that subpoena a fishing expedition - inspection of documents by Court Legislation Cited: Native Vegetation Act 2003 Cases Cited: Alister v The Queen [1984] HCA 85; 154 CLR 404 R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14 Darcey v Pre-Term Foundation Clinic [1983] 2 NSWLR 497 Perish v R [2015] NSWCCA 237 R v Turnbull (No 1) [2016] NSWSC 189 Texts Cited: --- Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Ian Robert Turnbull (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr PE Barrett (Crown) Mr T Alexis SC; Ms C O'Neill (Accused) Mr DK Jordan (Applicant - Office of Environment and Heritage)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Cole & Butler (Accused) Gordon Plath (Applicant - Director Litigation, Office of Environment and Heritage) File Number(s): 2014/223920 Publication restriction: ---
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate