NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hammond v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2016] NSWSC 701 Hearing dates: 31 May 2016 Date of orders: 31 May 2016 Decision date: 01 June 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 54(1) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2011 (NSW), leave granted to the plaintiffs to appeal.
(2) The appeal is upheld.
(3) The order of the second defendant refusing the plaintiffs' applications for separate hearings pursuant to s 21(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) is set aside. Catchwords: APPELLATE REVIEW – Criminal Law – Application for Leave to Appeal against interlocutory orders of the Local Court – interlocutory order made refusing application for separate trials – order infected by error as to evidence – error of law – error conceded by first defendant - no point of principle Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Hammond (First Plaintiff) Saomaauga Faitua (Second Plaintiff) Andrew Chasle (Third Plaintiff) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (First Defendant) The Local Court of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr H Dhanji SC with Mr S Russell (Plaintiffs) Mr D Kell with Ms S Baker (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate